Topic: E.G.O.I.S.M
In this world, consists of a variety of human behaviour
between good, bad, evil, honest and egoism. Whatever actions done are to
achieve one result which is the best. In ethics, egoism occurs depending on the
impacts of each situation. People may be motivated by a myriad of feelings such
as anger, fear, love, compassion, pride, a sense of justice, or a desire for
knowledge. In philosophy theory in ethics Egoism has two variants, descriptive
or normative.
What
is different between the descriptive egoism and the normative egoism?
The distinction between psychological egoism and
ethical egoism reflects the contrast of "is" verses
"ought," "fact" verses "value," or
"descriptive" verses "prescriptive."
The
descriptive egoism (Psychological egoism) is the
determining motive of every voluntary action is a desire for one's own welfare.
On this view, even though all actions are regarded as self-interested actions,
the egoist readily points out that people usually try to conceal the
determining motives for their actions because such concealment is usually in
their self-interest.
1. Psychological egoism is a descriptive theory
resulting from observations from human behaviour. As such, it can only be a
true empirical theory if there are no exceptions.
2. Psychological egoism makes no claim as to how one
should act. That all persons seek their self-interest on this theory is a
purported fact, and this belief is viewed by the psychological egoist as non-moral
and verifiable.
The
normative egoism(ethical egoism) is the ethical that each individual
should seek as an end only that individual's own welfare. The idea here is that
an individual's own welfare is the only thing that is ultimately valuable for
that individual.
1. Ethical egoism does not claim that all persons,
in fact, seek their own self-interest; ethical egoism only claims that we
should or ought seek our self-interest, even though all persons might not do
so.
2. If ethical egoism is to be regarded as a theory,
it must be universalized to hold for all persons.
According James Rachel, explain about common
confusion concerning selfishness and self-interest
Actions
in self-interest are not necessarily incompatible with the interest of others.
For example, it is in your self-interest for
everyone to be happy. If you are to help others, you must first be in a
position to do so. I.e., in many instances, you have to help yourself first to
obtain the knowledge of how to help others
REFERENCE
http://philosophy.lander.edu/ethics/ethical_ego.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoism
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil220/egoism.html
REFERENCE
http://philosophy.lander.edu/ethics/ethical_ego.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoism
http://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil220/egoism.html
No comments:
Post a Comment